Last
May, President Mullinex sent a letter to Shareowners with her
opinions/recollections regarding two efforts to convert Nassau
Gardens from a limited equity to market rate Cooperative, in the
1990s and early 2000s. Shareowners have twice voted overwhelmingly
for conversion. The opinions in her letter are not held by most
Shareowners and previous officers, and contain significant
disinformation.
Most
importantly, Ms. Mullinex wrote of the 2002-4 effort to convert, "It
was determined overwhelmingly that the membership was not interested
in converting to market rate."
NOT
TRUE: In
the Market Rate Committee's June 14, 2004 report to the Board,
co-chairs Kent Lawson and Pegg Mullinex (yes, the same her!) reported
78%
of those contacted were in
favor
of Market Rate and only 5% were opposed (above).
Exactly the opposite of what she wrote you last year!
This was an extensive, in-depth, well-managed straw poll with home
meetings, phone interviews, etc. Yes, many Shareowners did not
actively participate, but that was because we had already been
through the process in the 1990s (when over 2/3 voted to convert in a
binding special meeting) and knew the 2004 committee's work was more
informational for new members, and not binding.
Ms.
Mullinex wrote last year that the value of "market rate would
bring $30 to $50 thousand. It could, of course go for a good deal
more, maybe as high as $100,000."
FACT:
I
asked Donna Duggan, a highly experienced Realtor from McNulty Realty
in Norwood, to do an appraisal of our property this week. Her report
stated "a
good listing price range would be between $150-$165,000
for a 2 bedroom.
For a 1 bedroom unit, I recommend -$20,000 and to increase it $20,000
for a 3 bedroom."
Ms.
Mullinex wrote the market rate conversion process ended in 2004 in
part because "they did not send the vote to the Secretary of the
Commonwealth."
THEY?
It
is the responsibility of the President
and Clerk
to sign and submit the form (it's strictly procedural), not some
anonymous "they" as she wrote. Of course Ms. Mullinex never
filed the form; she does not want market rate. Cost is only $15. See
the state's form here:
http://www.sec.state.ma.us/cor/corpdf/180amen.pdf
Ms.
Mullinex's statements about HUD not allowing us the use of
Cooperative funds for conversion are technically correct, but were
limited to an earlier time period, not now or the past few years.
FACT:
That
was when our HUD HAP contract was in effect (Section 8 renters
subsidized by HUD). When that contract ended, that financial
limitation also ended, but the Board failed to subsequently pursue
conversion. It would have been no problem to use our own funds after
the contract ended. Jim Polito, our account manager at HUD, wrote me
April 14, 2009 (in government-speak) that "Without the use of
the [Cooperative's] Replacement Reserve [fund], in a development that
is [now] unsubsidized, it is not clear what role the government can
exercise here." It's moot today with HUD out; we can use our own
funds --
which
we have from refinancing --
to
cover market rate conversion costs.
Ms.
Mullinex repeatedly writes about how converting to market rate would
change our Cooperative 'culture' and "we would no longer be a
unified limited equity Cooperative" and "We are the best
deal in town and will remain so as long as we are a limited equity
cooperative."
Other
Opinions:
In 2002, former President and then Market Rate Committee Chairman
George Hildebrandt wrote an informational letter to all Shareowners
stating "the day-to-day operation of a Limited Equity and Market
Rate co-op is identical." As to 'how good a deal' we are today,
we're better off than an apartment renter, but that's about all.
Ms.
Mullinex refers to animosity, resignations, hurt friendships, etc.
over past conversion efforts.
That
goes on all the time here and is to be expected when Directors pursue
their personal agendas rather than the Cooperative good. Remember the
dueling newsletters from different Board factions as recently as last
year, under Ms. Mullinex's administration?
Ms.
Mullinex wrote "we have neither the time nor the money to
research this [conversion] fact and any additional legal expense
would have to be voted by the Board."
Well,
let's elect some new directors who will
find
the time ... Directors who are enablers rather than blockers like her
who look for excuses not to improve our Cooperative and Shareowner
value.
And
if our Board can find the Cooperative funds to seek a legal opinion
to not
evict a person whom they knew lived here for many years as a
prohibited subletter (a Director's son, no less!), hopefully a new
President will find some more of those funds to realize our equity.
Final
point:
There are 6,400 housing coops with 1,200,000 units in the U.S.,
according to the National Co-Operative Business Association. Ten
percent are HUD insured/assisted no or limited equity units (not us
any more). Discounting those HUD units, 277,000 other units (27%) are
limited equity; the other 765,000 (73%) units are market rate. So
Nassau Gardens shareowners are not just in the vast minority, we are
the poor
vast minority.

13 comments:
Fascinating read. Hope it gets done before I need a nursing home; could really use the extra financial resources then.
Nice mention of George Hildrebrand. Such a nice man, I really trusted him, Eunica was a sweetie too.
as enterprise capt jean luc picard would say...MAKE IT SO!
as uss eterprise capt jean luc picard would say ... MAKE IT SO!
We have voted twice now, overwhelmingly each time. But the directors ignore us. THROW THEM ALL OUT SUNDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's a pretty blatant lie about us not wanting to convert to market rate. Not voting for her again!
I hope we can convert to market rate. I'm always a bit embarrassed of my olde kitchen cabinets and counters and inexpensive appliances, especially when my snooty sister inlaw visits. I'd love to update everything but it's only worth it if I'd get it back in increased equity.
it's imperitive we vote all current directors out. If their so dumb to screw themselves out of $150,000 they shouldn't be allowed to run anything about the coop. Or use sharp utensils
I am on the fence about the market rate thing. I'm thinking that we'll end up with all foreigners living here with three families in one unit. When I moved here I said I was moving for the last time and hope that I live here for the next 40 years.
I do know that there are some directors that do alot of work for Nassau Gardens. If you want to vote for who does the most work you'll vote for Pegg, Steve, and Kent because they give so much of their personal time to the cooperative. Each of them has the cooperative spirit in mind and act according to what's best for the most people at the cooperative. Pegg works endless hours for our cooperative. We're very fortunate for having her as well as Kent and Steve.
Please vote for the benefit of all members, not just for yourself.
Two problems with your points.
1.) market rate has nothing to do with your "foreigners" comments. Nassau Gardens must abide by fair housing laws like everyone else.
2.) don't confuse hard working with biased and improper work. Our president deliberately abused her position for years by letting her son live here against our no subletting by-law for almost a decade. It was a clear conflict of interest and she should have resigned or been removed by the rest of the board.
Hear! Hear! President and other directors lack the ethics to serve us
I believe that the ability to screen our potential neighbors goes away with market rate. If that is correct we could have lots of criminals living here making our neighborhood less safe.
Regarding screening, no it will not change anything. Probably more disinformation for a board member. We would still be a Cooperative in every sense we are now. Only one article/by-law would change, that of the value of a share of stock. Market rate has no affect on any other by-law. We would still be an intact Cooperative with screening checks to assure new members would be able to pay their onging carrying charges, etc.
Despite all of the information put here about the present board and one director in particular, the results are in and two incumbents were voted back in. I'm happy about two of the directors getting in. Will have to wait and see the results of the tie for the third director.
Post a Comment